Dataset size
The latest Pacifiers & Teethers run found 20 recommended brands and 22 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Pacifiers & Teethers category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
20
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
22
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
10%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| MAM | 1 |
| Philips Avent | 2 |
| Dr. Brown's | 3 |
| Tommee Tippee | 4 |
| Chicco | 5 |
Movement
MAM overtook Philips Avent this week to take the top position.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Babygearlab, Healthline and Mommyhood101, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both name MAM first, Gemini names Philips Avent, and Perplexity names Nuby, which does not appear in the top five of any other engine.
Citation-ready
The latest Pacifiers & Teethers run found 20 recommended brands and 22 cited sources in AI answers.
MAM ranks #1 for Pacifiers & Teethers in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
MAM, Philips Avent, and Dr. Brown's lead Pacifiers & Teethers across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Babygearlab, Healthline, and Mommyhood101 are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved down this week
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #5 | #3 | 2 | #3 | |
| #4 | #6 | #4 | 2 | #4 | |
| #5 | #4 | #5 | 1 | #4 | |
| #6 | #3 | #6 | 3 | #2 | |
| #7 | #7 | #7 | 0 | #7 | |
| #8 | New | #8 | New | #8 | |
| #9 | #8 | #9 | 1 | #6 | |
| #10 | #9 | #10 | 1 | #4 |
20 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | #1 | #2 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | #2 | #1 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | +2 | #3 | #9 | #6 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | +2 | #5 | #3 | - | #5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | #7 | #7 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | -3 | #4 | - | #7 | #9 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | #4 | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #9 | - | - | #1 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | -1 | - | #5 | - | #6 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | #6 | #6 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 11 | -1 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | New | #1 | #1 | #2 | #2 | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | AV Aventa | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() |
| 14 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | -4 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | #10 | #10 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 18 | -2 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() | |
| 20 | -9 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
22 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 11 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | BabyfruitteethercoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 11 | ComotomoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 13 | MambabyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | NubyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 17 | Nuk UsaOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 18 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 19 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 20 | TommeetippeeOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 21 | PhilipsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 22 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| MAM | 1 |
| Philips Avent | 2 |
| Dr . Brown's | 3 |
| NUK | 4 |
| Tommee Tippee | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +4 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -1 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
7 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| MAM | 1 |
| Philips Avent | 2 |
| Tommee Tippee | 3 |
| Itzy Ritzy | 4 |
| Comotomo | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +2 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -5 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Philips Avent | 1 |
| MAM | 2 |
| Chicco | 3 |
| WubbaNub | 4 |
| Itzy Ritzy | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +3 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -2 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | +1 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -5 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
3 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Nuby | 1 |
| MAM | 2 |
| Philips Avent | 3 |
| Dr. Brown's | 4 |
| Tommee Tippee | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | AV Aventa | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() |
| 9 | -6 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | BabyfruitteethercoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 3 | ComotomoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 4 | DrbrownsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | MambabyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | NubyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | Nuk UsaOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 9 | TommeetippeeOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | PhilipsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
MAM is the most recommended pacifiers & teethers brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Philips Avent and Dr. Brown's. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both name MAM first, Gemini names Philips Avent, and Perplexity names Nuby.
The most cited sources for pacifiers & teethers recommendations are Babygearlab, Healthline and Mommyhood101, out of 22 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Babygearlab, Healthline and Mommyhood101, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Nuby entered the top 10 and NUK moved three or more positions in the pacifiers & teethers index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Pacifiers & Teethers. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/baby-and-toddler-baby-health-pacifiers-and-teethers
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.