Dataset size
The latest Pacifiers & Teethers run found 16 recommended brands and 18 cited sources in AI answers.
Pacifiers & Teethers
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Pacifiers & Teethers category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 4 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
16
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
18
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
2%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| MAM | 1 |
| Philips Avent | 2 |
| Dr. Brown's | 3 |
| NUK | 4 |
| Tommee Tippee | 5 |
What AI tools say about Pacifiers & Teethers
Movement
What changed this week?
MAM overtook Philips Avent this week to take the top position.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Healthline, Babygearlab and Consumerreports, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
MAM ranks #1 for Pacifiers & Teethers in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
MAM, Philips Avent, and Dr. Brown's lead Pacifiers & Teethers across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Healthline, Babygearlab, and Consumerreports are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyBiggest gains
Moved up this week
Tommee Tippee6 to #5
Biggest losses
Moved down this week
Itzy Ritzy3 to #8
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #3 | |
| #5 | #11 | #5 | 6 | #5 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #3 | |
| #7 | #8 | #7 | 1 | #3 | |
| #8 | #5 | #8 | 3 | #5 | |
| #9 | #7 | #9 | 2 | #7 | |
| #10 | #10 | #10 | 0 | #7 |
Current brand snapshot
16 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | #2 | #2 | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | #4 | #1 | #1 | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | #4 | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #2 | #8 | #5 | - | | |
| 5 | +6 | #7 | #3 | #9 | - | | |
| 6 | 0 | #5 | - | #4 | - | | |
| 7 | +1 | #6 | #9 | - | - | | |
| 8 | -3 | - | #5 | #10 | - | | |
| 9 | -2 | #8 | #7 | - | - | | |
| 10 | 0 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 11 | -2 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 12 | +1 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 13 | +1 | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 14 | -3 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 15 | 0 | #10 | - | - | - | | |
| 16 | -4 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
18 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | | |
| 2 | 7 | | |
| 3 | 3 | | |
| 4 | 3 | | |
| 5 | 3 | | |
| 6 | 3 | | |
| 7 | 2 | | |
| 8 | 2 | | |
| 9 | 2 | | |
| 10 | 2 | | |
| 11 | 2 | | |
| 12 | 1 | | |
| 13 | 1 | | |
| 14 | 1 | | |
| 15 | 1 | | |
| 16 | NubyOfficial | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | | |
| 18 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| MAM | 1 |
| NUK | 2 |
| Dr. Brown's | 3 |
| Philips Avent | 4 |
| Chicco | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | +1 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | +1 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | -3 | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | 0 | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | +2 | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | -1 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | 0 | #10 | - | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | | |
| 2 | 3 | | |
| 3 | 3 | | |
| 4 | 3 | | |
| 5 | 2 | | |
| 6 | 2 | | |
| 7 | 2 | | |
| 8 | 2 | | |
| 9 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Philips Avent | 1 |
| MAM | 2 |
| Tommee Tippee | 3 |
| Dr. Brown's | 4 |
| Itzy Ritzy | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | +1 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | +2 | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | -4 | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | -4 | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | -2 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | -3 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | | |
| 2 | 1 | | |
| 3 | 1 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | | |
| 6 | 1 | | |
| 7 | NubyOfficial | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Philips Avent | 1 |
| MAM | 2 |
| Dr. Brown's | 3 |
| Chicco | 4 |
| NUK | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | +1 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | +1 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | +2 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | +2 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 8 | -1 | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | -2 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 10 | -6 | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
3 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | | |
| 2 | 2 | | |
| 3 | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about Pacifiers & Teethers
Q1
Who leads Pacifiers & Teethers in AI answers?
MAM is the most recommended pacifiers & teethers brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Philips Avent and Dr. Brown's. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for Pacifiers & Teethers?
The most cited sources for pacifiers & teethers recommendations are Healthline, Babygearlab and Consumerreports, out of 18 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Healthline, Babygearlab and Consumerreports, which means the citation field is open.
Q3
How fresh is this Pacifiers & Teethers ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Tommee Tippee and Itzy Ritzy moved three or more positions in the pacifiers & teethers index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Pacifiers & Teethers. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/baby-and-toddler-baby-health-pacifiers-and-teethers
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for Pacifiers & Teethers, including 16 recommended brands and 18 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
[ get started ]
Make AI Search your next revenue channel
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.