Dataset size
The latest Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms run found 23 recommended brands and 16 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 13 September 2026
Brands
Category coverage
23
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
16
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
57%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Fish & Richardson | 1 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | 2 |
| Knobbe Martens | 3 |
| Finnegan | 4 |
| Foley & Lardner | 5 |
Movement
Fish & Richardson held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: Cooley, Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins dropped at least three positions.
Sources
Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Harrityllp, Knobbe and Alston are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 57% of all citations.
Citation-ready
The latest Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms run found 23 recommended brands and 16 cited sources in AI answers.
Fish & Richardson ranks #1 for Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Fish & Richardson, Kilpatrick Townsend, and Knobbe Martens lead Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Chambers, Harrityllp, and Knobbe are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #7 | #2 | 5 | #2 | |
| #3 | #12 | #3 | 9 | #3 | |
| #4 | #2 | #4 | 2 | #1 | |
| #5 | #6 | #5 | 1 | #3 | |
| #6 | #3 | #6 | 3 | #1 | |
| #7 | #8 | #7 | 1 | #3 | |
| #8 | #13 | #8 | 5 | #4 | |
| #9 | #19 | #9 | 10 | #9 | |
| #10 | #17 | #10 | 7 | #6 |
23 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #3 | #1 | #1 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | +5 | - | #2 | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | +9 | - | #3 | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | -2 | #10 | - | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | - | #9 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | -3 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +5 | #8 | #6 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +10 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | +7 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | +3 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | -3 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | -9 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | +2 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | +5 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | -4 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | +4 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | +1 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | -1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | -6 | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 22 | -6 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 23 | -1 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
16 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() | |
| 2 | HarrityllpOfficial | 10 | ![]() |
| 3 | KnobbeOfficial | 2 | ![]() ![]() |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 6 | AlstonOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | BakerbottsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | CrowellOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | FoleyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 11 | KirklandOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 12 | KlgatesOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 13 | KtslawOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 14 | MorganlewisOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | WolfgreenfieldOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | 1 |
| Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan | 2 |
| Fish & Richardson | 3 |
| Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP | 4 |
| Latham & Watkins | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +2 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +7 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -2 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +4 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -2 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +3 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -3 | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -8 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
1 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Fish & Richardson | 1 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | 2 |
| Knobbe Martens | 3 |
| Greenberg Traurig | 4 |
| Alston & Bird | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +2 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +3 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +6 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -6 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -2 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AlstonOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 2 | BakerbottsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | FoleyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | KlgatesOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | KnobbeOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | KtslawOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 9 | MorganlewisOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Fish & Richardson | 1 |
| Finnegan | 2 |
| Foley & Lardner | 3 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | 4 |
| Knobbe Martens | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +5 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +5 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +3 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +3 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
6 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HarrityllpOfficial | 10 | ![]() |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | CrowellOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | KnobbeOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 6 | WolfgreenfieldOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Fish & Richardson is the most recommended intellectual property (IP) law firms brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Kilpatrick Townsend and Knobbe Martens. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
The most cited sources for intellectual property (IP) law firms recommendations are Chambers, Harrityllp and Knobbe, out of 16 tracked sources. Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Harrityllp, Knobbe and Alston are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 57% of all citations. The main independent sources are Chambers, Ipwatchdog and Vault.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Greenberg Traurig, Knobbe Martens, Cooley, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP and Kilpatrick Townsend and 3 other brands moved three or more positions in the intellectual property (IP) law firms index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/business-services-legal-services-providers-intellectual-property-ip-law-firms
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
[ get started ]
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.