Dataset size
The latest Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms run found 24 recommended brands and 12 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 4 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
24
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
12
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
24%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | 1 |
| Fish & Richardson | 2 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | 3 |
| Cooley | 4 |
| Finnegan | 5 |
Movement
Kirkland & Ellis overtook Fish & Richardson this week to take the top position.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Chambers, Legal500 and Harrityllp, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
The latest Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms run found 24 recommended brands and 12 cited sources in AI answers.
Kirkland & Ellis ranks #1 for Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Kirkland & Ellis, Fish & Richardson, and Kilpatrick Townsend lead Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Chambers, Legal500, and Harrityllp are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #5 | #4 | 1 | #3 | |
| #5 | #14 | #5 | 9 | #1 | |
| #6 | #12 | #6 | 6 | #4 | |
| #7 | #11 | #7 | 4 | #7 | |
| #8 | #8 | #8 | 0 | #3 | |
| #9 | #12 | #9 | 3 | #3 | |
| #10 | New | #10 | New | #10 |
24 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | #1 | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #5 | - | #1 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #2 | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | #6 | - | #7 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | +9 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +6 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +4 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | +3 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | -4 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | +1 | #8 | - | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | +4 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | +1 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | -8 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | -5 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | +1 | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | -11 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | -10 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 22 | -16 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 23 | -12 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 24 | -14 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
12 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 3 | HarrityllpOfficial | 6 | ![]() |
| 4 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 5 | AlstonOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 6 | BakerbottsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | GoodwinlawOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 11 | SeedipOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | 1 |
| Latham & Watkins | 2 |
| Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan | 3 |
| WilmerHale | 4 |
| Fish & Richardson | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +5 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +3 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +2 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -4 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | 1 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | 2 |
| DLA Piper | 3 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | 4 |
| Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +4 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +4 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -3 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -5 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
6 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 2 | BakerbottsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | GoodwinlawOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Fish & Richardson | 1 |
| Finnegan | 2 |
| Foley & Lardner | 3 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | 4 |
| Knobbe Martens | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +3 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -1 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HarrityllpOfficial | 6 | ![]() |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | SeedipOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Kirkland & Ellis is the most recommended intellectual property (IP) law firms brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Fish & Richardson and Kilpatrick Townsend. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
The most cited sources for intellectual property (IP) law firms recommendations are Chambers, Legal500 and Harrityllp, out of 12 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Chambers, Legal500 and Harrityllp, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Debevoise & Plimpton entered the top 10 and Bird & Bird, Seed IP Law Group, Greenberg Traurig, Finnegan and Gibson Dunn and 4 other brands moved three or more positions in the intellectual property (IP) law firms index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Intellectual Property (IP) Law Firms. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/business-services-legal-services-providers-intellectual-property-ip-law-firms
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
[ get started ]
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.