Dataset size
The latest Product Information Management (PIM) Systems run found 20 recommended brands and 22 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Product Information Management (PIM) Systems category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
20
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
22
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
32%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Akeneo | 1 |
| Salsify | 2 |
| Pimcore | 3 |
| Inriver | 4 |
| Plytix | 5 |
Movement
Akeneo has held the top position since 3 May 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Gartner, G2 and G2, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
All four engines name Akeneo first, which is unusual: in most categories the engines disagree.
Citation-ready
The latest Product Information Management (PIM) Systems run found 20 recommended brands and 22 cited sources in AI answers.
Akeneo ranks #1 for Product Information Management (PIM) Systems in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Akeneo, Salsify, and Pimcore lead Product Information Management (PIM) Systems across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Gartner, G2, and G2 are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #4 | #2 | 2 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #2 | #4 | 2 | #2 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #4 | |
| #6 | #7 | #6 | 1 | #6 | |
| #7 | #12 | #7 | 5 | #7 | |
| #8 | #6 | #8 | 2 | #6 | |
| #9 | New | #9 | New | #9 | |
| #10 | #10 | #10 | 0 | #7 |
20 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | +2 | #3 | #3 | #3 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #6 | #4 | #8 | #5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | -2 | #4 | #5 | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | #8 | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | #2 | - | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | +5 | #7 | #6 | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | -2 | #8 | #7 | #7 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | #10 | - | #2 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | 0 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | 0 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 12 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 14 | 0 | - | #9 | #10 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 15 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | -1 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
22 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 12 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 11 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | PlytixOfficial | 5 | ![]() ![]() |
| 5 | InriverOfficial | 4 | ![]() |
| 6 | AkeneoOfficial | 3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| 7 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | CentricsoftwareOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 11 | ContentfulOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 12 | ContentservOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 13 | InformaticaOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | OracleOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 16 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 17 | PimcoreOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 18 | ProfiseeOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 19 | SalsifyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 20 | SapOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 21 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 22 | StiboOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Akeneo | 1 |
| Pimberly | 2 |
| Salsify | 3 |
| inriver | 4 |
| Plytix | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +5 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -4 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -2 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 4 | CentricsoftwareOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Akeneo | 1 |
| Stibo Systems | 2 |
| Salsify | 3 |
| Pimcore | 4 |
| inRiver | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +6 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -3 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +4 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -3 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Akeneo | 1 |
| Plytix | 2 |
| Salsify | 3 |
| Inriver | 4 |
| Pimberly | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +3 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -1 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | 0 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Akeneo | 1 |
| Informatica PIM | 2 |
| Salsify | 3 |
| Contentserv | 4 |
| PIMCore | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | +2 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | +1 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AkeneoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 2 | ContentfulOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 3 | ContentservOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 4 | InformaticaOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | OracleOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 6 | PimcoreOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | ProfiseeOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | SalsifyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 9 | SapOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | StiboOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Akeneo is the most recommended product information management (PIM) systems brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Salsify and Pimcore. All four engines name Akeneo first, which is unusual: in most categories the engines disagree.
The most cited sources for product information management (PIM) systems recommendations are Gartner, G2 and G2, out of 22 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Gartner, G2 and G2, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Informatica PIM entered the top 10 and Syndigo moved three or more positions in the product information management (PIM) systems index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Product Information Management (PIM) Systems. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/commerce-e-commerce-software-product-information-management-pim-systems
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.