Dataset size
The latest Overhead Projectors run found 20 recommended brands and 9 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Overhead Projectors category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 11 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
20
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
9
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
0%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| 3M | 1 |
| Dukane | 2 |
| Elmo | 3 |
| Apollo | 4 |
| Epson | 5 |
Movement
3M held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: Apollo and EPI entered the top 10 this week, while Bell & Howell and HamiltonBuhl dropped at least three positions.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Projectorcentral, Thomasnet and Epa, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
The latest Overhead Projectors run found 20 recommended brands and 9 cited sources in AI answers.
3M ranks #1 for Overhead Projectors in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
3M, Dukane, and Elmo lead Overhead Projectors across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Projectorcentral, Thomasnet, and Epa are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
20 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #4 | #2 | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | New | AP Apollo | #3 | - | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() |
| 5 | 0 | - | #4 | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | +4 | BU Buhl Industries | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() |
| 7 | -1 | - | #5 | #9 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | New | EP EPI | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() |
| 9 | +1 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | +6 | - | #10 | #7 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 11 | -2 | - | #9 | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 12 | -4 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | +4 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | -1 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | -10 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | -6 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | New | VI Viewlex | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() |
| 19 | -6 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | New | VI Victor | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 7 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| 3M | 1 |
| Buhl Industries | 2 |
| Apollo | 3 |
| Dukane | 4 |
| Liesegang | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | BU Buhl Industries | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() |
| 3 | New | AP Apollo | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() |
| 4 | -2 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +1 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | VI Viewlex | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() |
| 10 | New | VI Victor | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| 3M | 1 |
| Dukane | 2 |
| Elmo | 3 |
| Epson | 4 |
| Eiki | 5 |
10 brands
1 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| 3M | 1 |
| Dukane | 2 |
| EPI | 3 |
| Elmo | 4 |
| Apollo | 5 |
10 brands
2 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 1 | ![]() |
3M is the most recommended overhead projectors brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Dukane and Elmo. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
The most cited sources for overhead projectors recommendations are Projectorcentral, Thomasnet and Epa, out of 9 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Projectorcentral, Thomasnet and Epa, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Apollo and EPI entered the top 10 and Bell & Howell, BenQ, Buhl Industries and HamiltonBuhl moved three or more positions in the overhead projectors index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Overhead Projectors. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/electronics-video-projectors-overhead-projectors
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
[ get started ]
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.