Dataset size
The latest Conductivity Gels & Lotions run found 35 recommended brands and 33 cited sources in AI answers.
Conductivity Gels & Lotions
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Conductivity Gels & Lotions category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
35
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
33
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
59%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Parker Laboratories | 1 |
| McKesson | 2 |
| Dynarex | 3 |
| ThermoLabs | 4 |
| Medline | 5 |
What AI tools say about Conductivity Gels & Lotions
Movement
What changed this week?
Parker Laboratories held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: ThermoLabs and Celsis Labs entered the top 10 this week, while EvenSkyn, HR HealthCare, Mettler Electronics and ConduGel Pro dropped at least three positions.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Mckesson, Parkerlabs and Chattanoogarehab are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 59% of all citations.
Engines
Do AI engines agree on the leader?
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini name Parker Laboratories first and Perplexity names ThermoLabs, which does not appear in the top five of any other engine.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
Parker Laboratories ranks #1 for Conductivity Gels & Lotions in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
Parker Laboratories, McKesson, and Dynarex lead Conductivity Gels & Lotions across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Mckesson, Asinsight, and Parkerlabs are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyEntered the index
New in the top 10
ThermoLabs#4
Celsis Labs#6
Biggest gains
Moved up this week
Medline25 to #5
Dynarex22 to #3
NuFACE15 to #7
FOREO6 to #10
Biggest losses
Moved down this week
EvenSkyn15 to #17
HR HealthCare10 to #18
Mettler Electronics8 to #11
ConduGel Pro3 to #9
Unchanged at the top
Leader held position
Parker Laboratoriesstayed #1
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #4 | #2 | 2 | #2 | |
| #3 | #25 | #3 | 22 | #3 | |
| #4 | New | #4 | New | #4 | |
| #5 | #30 | #5 | 25 | #5 | |
| #6 | New | #6 | New | #6 | |
| #7 | #22 | #7 | 15 | #6 | |
| #8 | #9 | #8 | 1 | #8 | |
| #9 | #6 | #9 | 3 | #6 | |
| #10 | #16 | #10 | 6 | #10 |
Current brand snapshot
35 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | +2 | #7 | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | +22 | #6 | #5 | - | - | | |
| 4 | New | - | - | - | #1 | | |
| 5 | +25 | #10 | #3 | - | - | | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #2 | | |
| 7 | +15 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 8 | +1 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | -3 | - | - | - | #3 | | |
| 10 | +6 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 11 | -8 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 12 | +12 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 13 | New | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 14 | New | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 15 | New | - | - | - | #4 | | |
| 16 | New | - | - | - | #5 | | |
| 17 | -15 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 18 | -10 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 19 | New | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 20 | New | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 21 | New | - | - | - | #6 | | |
| 22 | New | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 23 | New | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 24 | New | - | - | - | #7 | | |
| 25 | New | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 26 | New | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 27 | New | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 28 | New | - | - | - | #8 | | |
| 29 | New | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 30 | New | - | - | - | #9 | | |
| 31 | -4 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 32 | New | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 33 | New | - | - | - | #10 | | |
| 34 | New | - | - | #10 | - | | |
| 35 | New | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
33 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MckessonOfficial | 6 | |
| 2 | 4 | | |
| 3 | ParkerlabsOfficial | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | | |
| 5 | ChattanoogarehabOfficial | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | | |
| 7 | MedlineOfficial | 2 | |
| 8 | MettlerelectronicsOfficial | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | BioearthlabOfficial | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | | |
| 12 | CompasshealthbrandsOfficial | 1 | |
| 13 | DynarexOfficial | 1 | |
| 14 | Eco MedOfficial | 1 | |
| 15 | NihonkohdenOfficial | 1 | |
| 16 | EvenskynOfficial | 1 | |
| 17 | ForeoOfficial | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | | |
| 19 | HrhealthcareOfficial | 1 | |
| 20 | NisshamedicalOfficial | 1 | |
| 21 | 1 | | |
| 22 | 1 | | |
| 23 | 1 | | |
| 24 | 1 | | |
| 25 | 1 | | |
| 26 | 1 | | |
| 27 | 1 | | |
| 28 | PerformancehealthOfficial | 1 | |
| 29 | NihonkohdenOfficial | 1 | |
| 30 | 1 | | |
| 31 | TechcaregelOfficial | 1 | |
| 32 | ThermolabsOfficial | 1 | |
| 33 | WeaverandcompanyOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Parker Laboratories | 1 |
| Weaver and Company | 2 |
| Mettler Electronics | 3 |
| ECO-MED | 4 |
| HR HealthCare | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | +3 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | New | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | New | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | +2 | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | -1 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | 0 | #10 | - | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
12 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MckessonOfficial | 5 | |
| 2 | ChattanoogarehabOfficial | 2 | |
| 3 | MedlineOfficial | 2 | |
| 4 | MettlerelectronicsOfficial | 2 | |
| 5 | DynarexOfficial | 1 | |
| 6 | Eco MedOfficial | 1 | |
| 7 | NihonkohdenOfficial | 1 | |
| 8 | HrhealthcareOfficial | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | ParkerlabsOfficial | 1 | |
| 11 | NihonkohdenOfficial | 1 | |
| 12 | WeaverandcompanyOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Parker Laboratories | 1 |
| McKesson | 2 |
| Medline Industries | 3 |
| Compass Health Brands | 4 |
| Dynarex Corporation | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | New | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | New | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | New | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | New | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | New | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | New | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | | |
| 2 | BioearthlabOfficial | 1 | |
| 3 | CompasshealthbrandsOfficial | 1 | |
| 4 | NisshamedicalOfficial | 1 | |
| 5 | MckessonOfficial | 1 | |
| 6 | ParkerlabsOfficial | 1 | |
| 7 | PerformancehealthOfficial | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | TechcaregelOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Parker Laboratories | 1 |
| NuFACE | 2 |
| FOREO | 3 |
| Absonic | 4 |
| EvenSkyn | 5 |
AbsonicOeneisNozerixCurrent brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | +5 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | +2 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | New | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | -1 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | New | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | | |
| 2 | 3 | | |
| 3 | EvenskynOfficial | 1 | |
| 4 | ForeoOfficial | 1 | |
| 5 | ParkerlabsOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| ThermoLabs | 1 |
| Celsis Labs | 2 |
| ConduGel Pro | 3 |
| GelTech Conductives | 4 |
| BioConductive | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | - | - | - | #1 | | |
| 2 | New | - | - | - | #2 | | |
| 3 | -1 | - | - | - | #3 | | |
| 4 | New | - | - | - | #4 | | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #7 | | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | |
Current source snapshot
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | | |
| 2 | 1 | | |
| 3 | 1 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | | |
| 6 | 1 | | |
| 7 | 1 | | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | ThermolabsOfficial | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about Conductivity Gels & Lotions
Q1
Who leads Conductivity Gels & Lotions in AI answers?
Parker Laboratories is the most recommended conductivity gels & lotions brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are McKesson and Dynarex. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini name Parker Laboratories first and Perplexity names ThermoLabs.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for Conductivity Gels & Lotions?
The most cited sources for conductivity gels & lotions recommendations are Mckesson, Asinsight and Parkerlabs, out of 33 tracked sources. Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Mckesson, Parkerlabs and Chattanoogarehab are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 59% of all citations. The main independent sources are Asinsight, Sona and Healthproductsforyou.
Q3
How fresh is this Conductivity Gels & Lotions ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, ThermoLabs and Celsis Labs entered the top 10 and Medline, Dynarex, NuFACE, EvenSkyn and HR HealthCare and 3 other brands moved three or more positions in the conductivity gels & lotions index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Conductivity Gels & Lotions. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/health-and-beauty-health-care-conductivity-gels-and-lotions
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for Conductivity Gels & Lotions, including 35 recommended brands and 33 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
Reveal where AI sends your clients
Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.