Dataset size
The latest Hearing Aids run found 17 recommended brands and 30 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Hearing Aids category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
17
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
30
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
13%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Phonak | 1 |
| Oticon | 2 |
| Signia | 3 |
| Starkey | 4 |
| ReSound | 5 |
Movement
Phonak has held the top position since 14 June 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Ncoa, Hearingtracker and Forbes, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
All four engines name Phonak first, which is unusual: in most categories the engines disagree.
Citation-ready
The latest Hearing Aids run found 17 recommended brands and 30 cited sources in AI answers.
Phonak ranks #1 for Hearing Aids in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Phonak, Oticon, and Signia lead Hearing Aids across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Ncoa, Hearingtracker, and Forbes are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #3 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #3 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #3 | |
| #7 | #7 | #7 | 0 | #7 | |
| #8 | #8 | #8 | 0 | #8 | |
| #9 | #9 | #9 | 0 | #9 | |
| #10 | New | #10 | New | #10 |
17 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | #3 | #2 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #4 | #5 | #4 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #5 | #2 | #5 | #6 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #3 | #6 | #7 | #5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | #7 | #6 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | #8 | #4 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | #7 | #8 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | #10 | #10 | #9 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 11 | -1 | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 12 | -1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Phonak | 1 |
| Oticon | 2 |
| ReSound | 3 |
| Signia | 4 |
| Starkey | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
3 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 7 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Phonak | 1 |
| Starkey | 2 |
| Oticon | 3 |
| Jabra Enhance | 4 |
| Signia | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +3 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -2 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
15 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 11 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 13 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Phonak | 1 |
| Oticon | 2 |
| Jabra Enhance | 3 |
| Signia | 4 |
| Starkey | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +4 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -1 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
7 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Phonak | 1 |
| Widex | 2 |
| Oticon | 3 |
| Signia | 4 |
| ReSound | 5 |
10 brands
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BeltoneOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 2 | Bluenote HearingOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 3 | GnhearingOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 4 | IntertonOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | OticonOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 6 | PhonakOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | ResoundOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | Signia HearingOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 9 | StarkeyOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | WidexOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Phonak is the most recommended hearing aids brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Oticon and Signia. All four engines name Phonak first, which is unusual: in most categories the engines disagree.
The most cited sources for hearing aids recommendations are Ncoa, Hearingtracker and Forbes, out of 30 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Ncoa, Hearingtracker and Forbes, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, BlueNote entered the top 10 in the hearing aids index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Hearing Aids. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/health-and-beauty-health-care-hearing-aids
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.