Dataset size
The latest Lotion & Moisturizer run found 21 recommended brands and 25 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Lotion & Moisturizer category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
21
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
25
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
4%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| CeraVe | 1 |
| La Roche-Posay | 2 |
| Cetaphil | 3 |
| Neutrogena | 4 |
| Eucerin | 5 |
Movement
CeraVe held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: Nivea and Aveeno dropped at least three positions.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Consumerreports, Theamaranthinecollective and Goodhousekeeping, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini name CeraVe first and Perplexity names Neutrogena.
Citation-ready
The latest Lotion & Moisturizer run found 21 recommended brands and 25 cited sources in AI answers.
CeraVe ranks #1 for Lotion & Moisturizer in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
CeraVe, La Roche-Posay, and Cetaphil lead Lotion & Moisturizer across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Consumerreports, Theamaranthinecollective, and Goodhousekeeping are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #5 | #4 | 1 | #2 | |
| #5 | #6 | #5 | 1 | #5 | |
| #6 | #10 | #6 | 4 | #6 | |
| #7 | #4 | #7 | 3 | #4 | |
| #8 | #7 | #8 | 1 | #7 | |
| #9 | #15 | #9 | 6 | #7 | |
| #10 | #14 | #10 | 4 | #5 |
21 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #3 | #3 | #2 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #4 | #2 | - | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | #5 | #4 | - | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | #6 | - | #6 | #8 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | +4 | - | #6 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | -3 | - | #5 | - | #5 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | #2 | #8 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +6 | #7 | - | - | #7 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | +4 | - | - | #8 | #6 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 11 | 0 | - | - | #5 | #9 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 12 | New | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | +1 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | #10 | #10 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 17 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | -13 | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
25 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 11 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 12 | PaulaschoiceOfficial | 2 | ![]() |
| 13 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 17 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 18 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 19 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 20 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 21 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 22 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 23 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 24 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 25 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| CeraVe | 1 |
| Vaseline | 2 |
| La Roche-Posay | 3 |
| Cetaphil | 4 |
| Neutrogena | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +4 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -2 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| CeraVe | 1 |
| Cetaphil | 2 |
| La Roche-Posay | 3 |
| Neutrogena | 4 |
| Aveeno | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +2 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +2 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -3 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| CeraVe | 1 |
| La Roche-Posay | 2 |
| Nécessaire | 3 |
| Lubriderm | 4 |
| Vanicream | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -2 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Neutrogena | 1 |
| Cetaphil | 2 |
| La Roche-Posay | 3 |
| CeraVe | 4 |
| Aveeno | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | +4 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | +2 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | -3 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | -2 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | +2 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | +1 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | -6 | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
7 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() |
CeraVe is the most recommended lotion & moisturizer brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are La Roche-Posay and Cetaphil. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini name CeraVe first and Perplexity names Neutrogena.
The most cited sources for lotion & moisturizer recommendations are Consumerreports, Theamaranthinecollective and Goodhousekeeping, out of 25 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Consumerreports, Theamaranthinecollective and Goodhousekeeping, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Nivea, Kiehl's, Nécessaire, Olay and Aveeno moved three or more positions in the lotion & moisturizer index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Lotion & Moisturizer. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/health-and-beauty-personal-care-cosmetics-skin-care-lotion-and-moisturizer
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.