Dataset size
The latest Carpet Shampooers run found 15 recommended brands and 16 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Carpet Shampooers category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 11 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
15
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
16
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
7%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Bissell | 1 |
| Hoover | 2 |
| Rug Doctor | 3 |
| Shark | 4 |
| Tineco | 5 |
Movement
Bissell has held the top position since 28 June 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Consumerreports, Vacuumwars and Goodhousekeeping, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
The latest Carpet Shampooers run found 15 recommended brands and 16 cited sources in AI answers.
Bissell ranks #1 for Carpet Shampooers in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Bissell, Hoover, and Rug Doctor lead Carpet Shampooers across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Consumerreports, Vacuumwars, and Goodhousekeeping are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #2 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #5 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #6 | |
| #7 | #9 | #7 | 2 | #6 | |
| #8 | New | #8 | New | #8 | |
| #9 | #7 | #9 | 2 | #6 | |
| #10 | #13 | #10 | 3 | #7 |
15 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | #2 | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #4 | #4 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #3 | #5 | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | #3 | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #8 | - | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | +2 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -2 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | +3 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | +3 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | -1 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | -2 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | -4 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Bissell | 1 |
| Hoover | 2 |
| Shark | 3 |
| Rug Doctor | 4 |
| Tineco | 5 |
9 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +2 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +2 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -2 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Bissell | 1 |
| Hoover | 2 |
| Tineco | 3 |
| Rug Doctor | 4 |
| Shark | 5 |
8 brands
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Bissell | 1 |
| Hoover | 2 |
| Rug Doctor | 3 |
| Shark | 4 |
| Tineco | 5 |
9 brands
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() |
Bissell is the most recommended carpet shampooers brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Hoover and Rug Doctor. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
The most cited sources for carpet shampooers recommendations are Consumerreports, Vacuumwars and Goodhousekeeping, out of 16 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Consumerreports, Vacuumwars and Goodhousekeeping, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Roborock entered the top 10 and Eureka moved three or more positions in the carpet shampooers index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Carpet Shampooers. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/home-and-garden-household-appliances-floor-and-steam-cleaners-carpet-shampooers
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
[ get started ]
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.