Dataset size
The latest Food Dehydrators run found 12 recommended brands and 16 cited sources in AI answers.
Food Dehydrators
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Food Dehydrators category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 4 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
12
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
16
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
0%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Excalibur | 1 |
| COSORI | 2 |
| Nesco | 3 |
| Magic Mill | 4 |
| Brod & Taylor | 5 |
What AI tools say about Food Dehydrators
Movement
What changed this week?
Excalibur overtook COSORI this week to take the top position.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Foodnetwork, Techgearlab and Expertmarketresearch, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
Excalibur ranks #1 for Food Dehydrators in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
Excalibur, COSORI, and Nesco lead Food Dehydrators across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Foodnetwork, Techgearlab, and Expertmarketresearch are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyBiggest gains
Moved up this week
NutriChef4 to #8
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #3 | |
| #5 | #7 | #5 | 2 | #5 | |
| #6 | #5 | #6 | 1 | #4 | |
| #7 | #6 | #7 | 1 | #4 | |
| #8 | #12 | #8 | 4 | #8 | |
| #9 | #8 | #9 | 1 | #5 | |
| #10 | #11 | #10 | 1 | #7 |
Current brand snapshot
12 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | #1 | #3 | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | #2 | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | #3 | #1 | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | #4 | #5 | - | | |
| 5 | +2 | #6 | #7 | #4 | - | | |
| 6 | -1 | #5 | #6 | #8 | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | #7 | #5 | #9 | - | | |
| 8 | +4 | #9 | #9 | #7 | - | | |
| 9 | -1 | #8 | - | #6 | - | | |
| 10 | +1 | #10 | #8 | - | - | | |
| 11 | New | - | - | #10 | - | | |
| 12 | -2 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
16 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | | |
| 2 | 11 | | |
| 3 | 5 | | |
| 4 | 5 | | |
| 5 | 3 | | |
| 6 | 3 | | |
| 7 | 3 | | |
| 8 | 2 | | |
| 9 | 2 | | |
| 10 | 2 | | |
| 11 | 2 | | |
| 12 | 1 | | |
| 13 | 1 | | |
| 14 | 1 | | |
| 15 | 1 | | |
| 16 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Excalibur | 1 |
| COSORI | 2 |
| Nesco | 3 |
| Magic Mill | 4 |
| Tribest | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | +1 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | -1 | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | 0 | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | 0 | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | 0 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | 0 | #10 | - | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | | |
| 2 | 6 | | |
| 3 | 3 | | |
| 4 | 2 | | |
| 5 | 2 | | |
| 6 | 2 | | |
| 7 | 1 | | |
| 8 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Excalibur | 1 |
| COSORI | 2 |
| Nesco | 3 |
| Magic Mill | 4 |
| Presto | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | +3 | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | -1 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | -2 | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | -2 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | -3 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | | |
| 2 | 3 | | |
| 3 | 1 | | |
| 4 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Nesco | 1 |
| COSORI | 2 |
| Excalibur | 3 |
| Brod & Taylor | 4 |
| Magic Mill | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +2 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | -1 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | +2 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | +2 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | +2 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | +1 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 8 | -4 | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | -4 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | | |
| 2 | 5 | | |
| 3 | 3 | | |
| 4 | 2 | | |
| 5 | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about Food Dehydrators
Q1
Who leads Food Dehydrators in AI answers?
Excalibur is the most recommended food dehydrators brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are COSORI and Nesco. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for Food Dehydrators?
The most cited sources for food dehydrators recommendations are Foodnetwork, Techgearlab and Expertmarketresearch, out of 16 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Foodnetwork, Techgearlab and Expertmarketresearch, which means the citation field is open.
Q3
How fresh is this Food Dehydrators ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, NutriChef moved three or more positions in the food dehydrators index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Food Dehydrators. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/home-and-garden-kitchen-and-dining-kitchen-appliances-food-dehydrators
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for Food Dehydrators, including 12 recommended brands and 16 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
[ get started ]
Make AI Search your next revenue channel
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.