Dataset size
The latest Juicers run found 15 recommended brands and 33 cited sources in AI answers.
Juicers
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Juicers category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
15
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
33
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
4%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Breville | 1 |
| Hurom | 2 |
| Nama | 3 |
| Omega | 4 |
| Kuvings | 5 |
What AI tools say about Juicers
Movement
What changed this week?
Breville has held the top position since 14 June 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Goodhousekeeping, Foodnetwork and Tomsguide, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
Do AI engines agree on the leader?
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini name Nama first and Perplexity names Breville.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
Breville ranks #1 for Juicers in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
Breville, Hurom, and Nama lead Juicers across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Goodhousekeeping, Foodnetwork, and Tomsguide are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyBiggest gains
Moved up this week
Cuisinart4 to #7
Unchanged at the top
Leader held position
Brevillestayed #1
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #3 | #2 | 1 | #2 | |
| #3 | #4 | #3 | 1 | #2 | |
| #4 | #2 | #4 | 2 | #2 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #4 | |
| #6 | #7 | #6 | 1 | #6 | |
| #7 | #11 | #7 | 4 | #6 | |
| #8 | #6 | #8 | 2 | #6 | |
| #9 | #9 | #9 | 0 | #8 | |
| #10 | #8 | #10 | 2 | #6 |
Current brand snapshot
15 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #2 | #2 | #3 | #1 | | |
| 2 | +1 | #3 | #3 | #4 | #2 | | |
| 3 | +1 | #1 | #1 | #1 | - | | |
| 4 | -2 | #5 | #5 | #5 | #3 | | |
| 5 | 0 | #4 | #4 | #2 | #9 | | |
| 6 | +1 | #6 | #6 | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | +4 | #8 | - | #7 | #7 | | |
| 8 | -2 | #9 | #7 | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | 0 | #10 | #9 | #9 | #8 | | |
| 10 | -2 | #7 | #8 | - | - | | |
| 11 | New | #5 | #5 | #5 | #3 | | |
| 12 | New | - | - | - | #5 | | |
| 13 | New | - | - | - | #6 | | |
| 14 | -1 | - | #10 | - | - | | |
| 15 | New | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
33 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | | |
| 2 | 8 | | |
| 3 | 7 | | |
| 4 | 4 | | |
| 5 | 4 | | |
| 6 | 4 | | |
| 7 | 3 | | |
| 8 | 3 | | |
| 9 | 3 | | |
| 10 | 3 | | |
| 11 | 2 | | |
| 12 | 2 | | |
| 13 | 2 | | |
| 14 | 2 | | |
| 15 | 2 | | |
| 16 | 2 | | |
| 17 | 1 | | |
| 18 | 1 | | |
| 19 | 1 | | |
| 20 | 1 | | |
| 21 | 1 | | |
| 22 | CuisinartOfficial | 1 | |
| 23 | 1 | | |
| 24 | 1 | | |
| 25 | HuromOfficial | 1 | |
| 26 | 1 | | |
| 27 | 1 | | |
| 28 | 1 | | |
| 29 | KuvingsusaOfficial | 1 | |
| 30 | 1 | | |
| 31 | 1 | | |
| 32 | 1 | | |
| 33 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Nama | 1 |
| Breville | 2 |
| Hurom | 3 |
| Kuvings | 4 |
| Omega | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | +1 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | -1 | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | +2 | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | -3 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | -2 | #10 | - | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | | |
| 2 | 4 | | |
| 3 | 4 | | |
| 4 | 3 | | |
| 5 | 3 | | |
| 6 | 2 | | |
| 7 | 2 | | |
| 8 | 2 | | |
| 9 | CuisinartOfficial | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Nama | 1 |
| Breville | 2 |
| Hurom | 3 |
| Kuvings | 4 |
| Omega | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | +3 | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | -1 | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | -1 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | 0 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | 0 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | | |
| 2 | 4 | | |
| 3 | 3 | | |
| 4 | 2 | | |
| 5 | 1 | | |
| 6 | HuromOfficial | 1 | |
| 7 | KuvingsusaOfficial | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Nama | 1 |
| Kuvings | 2 |
| Breville | 3 |
| Hurom | 4 |
| Omega | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +3 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | +3 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | -2 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | -1 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | -3 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | +3 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 8 | -2 | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | -1 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | | |
| 2 | 3 | | |
| 3 | 2 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Breville | 1 |
| Hurom | 2 |
| Omega | 3 |
| Omega Juicers (Breville US) | 4 |
| Philips | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
9 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | | |
| 2 | +1 | - | - | - | #2 | | |
| 3 | -1 | - | - | - | #3 | | |
| 4 | New | - | - | - | #3 | | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | | |
| 7 | +1 | - | - | - | #7 | | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | | |
| 9 | -5 | - | - | - | #9 | |
Current source snapshot
14 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | | |
| 2 | 3 | | |
| 3 | 2 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | | |
| 6 | 1 | | |
| 7 | 1 | | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | 1 | | |
| 11 | 1 | | |
| 12 | 1 | | |
| 13 | 1 | | |
| 14 | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about Juicers
Q1
Who leads Juicers in AI answers?
Breville is the most recommended juicers brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Hurom and Nama. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini name Nama first and Perplexity names Breville.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for Juicers?
The most cited sources for juicers recommendations are Goodhousekeeping, Foodnetwork and Tomsguide, out of 33 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Goodhousekeeping, Foodnetwork and Tomsguide, which means the citation field is open.
Q3
How fresh is this Juicers ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Cuisinart moved three or more positions in the juicers index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Juicers. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/home-and-garden-kitchen-and-dining-kitchen-appliances-juicers
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for Juicers, including 15 recommended brands and 33 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
Reveal where AI sends your clients
Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.