Dataset size
The latest Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) run found 13 recommended brands and 18 cited sources in AI answers.
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 4 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
13
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
18
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
8%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| iCIMS | 1 |
| Greenhouse | 2 |
| Workday | 3 |
| Workable | 4 |
| Lever | 5 |
What AI tools say about Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Movement
What changed this week?
iCIMS overtook Greenhouse this week to take the top position.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Zapier, G2 and Greenhouse, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
iCIMS ranks #1 for Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
iCIMS, Greenhouse, and Workday lead Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Zapier, G2, and Greenhouse are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyBiggest gains
Moved up this week
SmartRecruiters7 to #7
BambooHR4 to #6
Biggest losses
Moved down this week
JazzHR4 to #11
Bullhorn4 to #13
Ashby3 to #9
Rippling3 to #10
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #5 | #3 | 2 | #3 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #2 | |
| #5 | #3 | #5 | 2 | #2 | |
| #6 | #10 | #6 | 4 | #2 | |
| #7 | #14 | #7 | 7 | #4 | |
| #8 | #8 | #8 | 0 | #5 | |
| #9 | #6 | #9 | 3 | #4 | |
| #10 | #7 | #10 | 3 | #7 |
Current brand snapshot
13 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #3 | #2 | #2 | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | #1 | #6 | #1 | - | | |
| 3 | +2 | #2 | #1 | #8 | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #7 | #4 | #3 | - | | |
| 5 | -2 | #5 | #5 | #7 | - | | |
| 6 | +4 | #8 | #8 | #4 | - | | |
| 7 | +7 | #6 | - | #6 | - | | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #7 | #5 | - | | |
| 9 | -3 | #4 | - | #10 | - | | |
| 10 | -3 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 11 | -4 | #10 | #9 | #9 | - | | |
| 12 | -1 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 13 | -4 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Greenhouse | 1 |
| Workday | 2 |
| iCIMS | 3 |
| Ashby | 4 |
| Lever | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | +2 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | -2 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | 0 | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | 0 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | 0 | #10 | - | - | - | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Workday | 1 |
| iCIMS | 2 |
| Rippling | 3 |
| Workable | 4 |
| Lever | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +5 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | +2 | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | -2 | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | -2 | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | -5 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | -1 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | -5 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | | |
| 2 | BullhornOfficial | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Greenhouse | 1 |
| iCIMS | 2 |
| Workable | 3 |
| BambooHR | 4 |
| Zoho Recruit | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | +6 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | -1 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | +3 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | -2 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 8 | +2 | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | -3 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 10 | -2 | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
7 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GreenhouseOfficial | 6 | |
| 2 | 5 | | |
| 3 | 3 | | |
| 4 | 2 | | |
| 5 | 2 | | |
| 6 | 1 | | |
| 7 | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Q1
Who leads Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in AI answers?
iCIMS is the most recommended applicant tracking systems (ATS) brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Greenhouse and Workday. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)?
The most cited sources for applicant tracking systems (ATS) recommendations are Zapier, G2 and Greenhouse, out of 18 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Zapier, G2 and Greenhouse, which means the citation field is open.
Q3
How fresh is this Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, SmartRecruiters, BambooHR, JazzHR, Bullhorn and Ashby and 1 other brand moved three or more positions in the applicant tracking systems (ATS) index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/hr-recruiting-software-talent-acquisition-suites-software-applicant-tracking-systems-ats
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), including 13 recommended brands and 18 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
[ get started ]
Make AI Search your next revenue channel
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.