Dataset size
The latest Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools run found 18 recommended brands and 13 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
18
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
13
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
9%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Dynatrace | 1 |
| Datadog | 2 |
| New Relic | 3 |
| AppDynamics | 4 |
| IBM | 5 |
Movement
Dynatrace overtook Datadog this week to take the top position.
Sources
Review platforms shape this category: G2 and G2 are the most cited review sources, and review platforms account for 38% of all citations.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both name Dynatrace first, Gemini names Datadog, and Perplexity names New Relic.
Citation-ready
The latest Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools run found 18 recommended brands and 13 cited sources in AI answers.
Dynatrace ranks #1 for Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Dynatrace, Datadog, and New Relic lead Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
G2, Gartner, and Augmentcode are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #1 | |
| #5 | New | #5 | New | #5 | |
| #6 | #15 | #6 | 9 | #6 | |
| #7 | New | #7 | New | #7 | |
| #8 | #8 | #8 | 0 | #8 | |
| #9 | #13 | #9 | 4 | #9 | |
| #10 | #5 | #10 | 5 | #5 |
18 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | #1 | #2 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | #3 | #1 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | #2 | #3 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #7 | #4 | #4 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | New | #4 | #10 | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +9 | #5 | - | #8 | #6 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | #5 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #7 | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +4 | #10 | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -5 | - | #6 | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | +1 | #9 | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | +4 | #3 | #2 | #3 | #1 | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | #2 | #3 | #1 | #3 | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | -5 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | -12 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Dynatrace | 1 |
| Datadog | 2 |
| New Relic | 3 |
| IBM Instana | 4 |
| Sentry | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +3 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +4 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | 0 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
1 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Dynatrace | 1 |
| New Relic | 2 |
| Datadog | 3 |
| AppDynamics | 4 |
| ManageEngine | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +5 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Datadog | 1 |
| Dynatrace | 2 |
| New Relic | 3 |
| AppDynamics | 4 |
| IBM Instana | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -1 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -5 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| New Relic | 1 |
| Dynatrace | 2 |
| Datadog | 3 |
| AppDynamics | 4 |
| Elastic Observability | 5 |
9 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +2 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | +2 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | -2 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | +2 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 9 | -3 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() |
Dynatrace is the most recommended application performance monitoring (APM) tools brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Datadog and New Relic. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Google AI Mode both name Dynatrace first, Gemini names Datadog, and Perplexity names New Relic.
The most cited sources for application performance monitoring (APM) tools recommendations are G2, Gartner and Augmentcode, out of 13 tracked sources. Review platforms shape this category: G2 and G2 are the most cited review sources, and review platforms account for 38% of all citations.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, IBM and Elastic APM entered the top 10 and Instana, Sentry, Splunk and ManageEngine moved three or more positions in the application performance monitoring (APM) tools index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/it-infrastructure-monitoring-software-application-performance-monitoring-apm-tools
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.