Dataset size
The latest Graphic Design Companies run found 29 recommended brands and 23 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Graphic Design Companies category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
29
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
23
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
4%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Pentagram | 1 |
| Landor | 2 |
| Wolff Olins | 3 |
| Collins | 4 |
| Pearlfisher | 5 |
Movement
Pentagram held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: Pearlfisher, Clay Global and Turner Duckworth entered the top 10 this week, while Interbrand dropped at least three positions.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Designrush, Reddit and G2, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
All four engines name Pentagram first, which is unusual: in most categories the engines disagree.
Citation-ready
The latest Graphic Design Companies run found 29 recommended brands and 23 cited sources in AI answers.
Pentagram ranks #1 for Graphic Design Companies in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Pentagram, Landor, and Wolff Olins lead Graphic Design Companies across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Designrush, Reddit, and G2 are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #9 | #4 | 5 | #4 | |
| #5 | New | #5 | New | #5 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #6 | |
| #7 | #10 | #7 | 3 | #5 | |
| #8 | New | #8 | New | #8 | |
| #9 | #14 | #9 | 5 | #9 | |
| #10 | New | #10 | New | #10 |
29 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | #8 | #3 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | #4 | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | +5 | #5 | - | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | New | #6 | - | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #9 | #2 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | +3 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | +5 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | -1 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | -1 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | -14 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 20 | +2 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | +2 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 22 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 23 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 24 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 25 | -8 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 26 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 27 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() | |
| 28 | -13 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 29 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Pentagram | 1 |
| Landor | 2 |
| Wolff Olins | 3 |
| Turner Duckworth | 4 |
| Collins | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 7 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Pentagram | 1 |
| Superside | 2 |
| Clay Global | 3 |
| Wolff Olins | 4 |
| Baunfire | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +8 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -3 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -6 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -2 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Pentagram | 1 |
| Collins | 2 |
| Landor | 3 |
| Pearlfisher | 4 |
| Wolff Olins | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Pentagram | 1 |
| Sagmeister & Walsh | 2 |
| IDEO | 3 |
| Landor & Fitch | 4 |
| MetaLab | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | +4 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | -2 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() |
Pentagram is the most recommended graphic design companies brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Landor and Wolff Olins. All four engines name Pentagram first, which is unusual: in most categories the engines disagree.
The most cited sources for graphic design companies recommendations are Designrush, Reddit and G2, out of 23 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Designrush, Reddit and G2, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Pearlfisher, Clay Global and Turner Duckworth entered the top 10 and Interbrand, Collins, IDEO and Sagmeister & Walsh moved three or more positions in the graphic design companies index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Graphic Design Companies. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/professional-services-creative-services-providers-graphic-design-companies
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.