Dataset size
The latest Product Design Services Providers run found 29 recommended brands and 20 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Product Design Services Providers category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
29
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
20
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
0%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| IDEO | 1 |
| Frog Design | 2 |
| Clay | 3 |
| Work & Co | 4 |
| Usto | 5 |
Movement
IDEO held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: Usto, Droid Technologies and Trinetix entered the top 10 this week, while MetaLab and Pentagram dropped at least three positions.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Clutch, Gapsystudio and Equal, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Droid Technologies, which does not appear in the top five of any other engine, Google AI Mode names Clay, and Gemini and Perplexity both name IDEO first.
Citation-ready
The latest Product Design Services Providers run found 29 recommended brands and 20 cited sources in AI answers.
IDEO ranks #1 for Product Design Services Providers in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
IDEO, Frog Design, and Clay lead Product Design Services Providers across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Clutch, Gapsystudio, and Equal are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #4 | |
| #5 | New | #5 | New | #5 | |
| #6 | #9 | #6 | 3 | #4 | |
| #7 | New | #7 | New | #7 | |
| #8 | #14 | #8 | 6 | #8 | |
| #9 | #17 | #9 | 8 | #3 | |
| #10 | New | #10 | New | #10 |
29 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #2 | #1 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | #3 | #2 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #1 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #4 | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +3 | #2 | #10 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +6 | - | #6 | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +8 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | +4 | - | #8 | #7 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 12 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | -7 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 15 | -10 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | - | #7 | #10 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 18 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | -9 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 22 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 23 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 24 | +2 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 25 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 26 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 27 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 28 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 29 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
20 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 9 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 10 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 11 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 13 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 17 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 18 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 19 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 20 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Droid Technologies | 1 |
| Design 1st | 2 |
| Trinetix | 3 |
| Integra Sources | 4 |
| Uruit | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
1 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Clay | 1 |
| IDEO | 2 |
| Frog Design | 3 |
| Work & Co | 4 |
| Usto | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +4 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +3 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | +1 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| IDEO | 1 |
| Frog Design | 2 |
| Clay | 3 |
| Work & Co | 4 |
| MetaLab | 5 |
10 brands
3 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| IDEO | 1 |
| Frog Design | 2 |
| Teague | 3 |
| Pentagram | 4 |
| Informa Design Studio | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | +3 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() |
IDEO is the most recommended product design services providers brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Frog Design and Clay. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Droid Technologies, Google AI Mode names Clay, and Gemini and Perplexity both name IDEO first.
The most cited sources for product design services providers recommendations are Clutch, Gapsystudio and Equal, out of 20 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Clutch, Gapsystudio and Equal, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Usto, Droid Technologies and Trinetix entered the top 10 and MetaLab, Teague, Pentagram, Ramotion and Design 1st moved three or more positions in the product design services providers index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Product Design Services Providers. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/professional-services-creative-services-providers-product-design-services-providers
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.