Dataset size
The latest iOS Developers run found 36 recommended brands and 20 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the iOS Developers category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
36
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
20
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
17%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| ChopDawg | 1 |
| Lickability | 2 |
| Appinventiv | 3 |
| Apple | 4 |
| ArcTouch | 5 |
Movement
ChopDawg held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: ChopDawg, ArcTouch and Utility entered the top 10 this week, while Fueled and Empat dropped at least three positions.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Clutch, Goodfirms and Mismo, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree completely. ChatGPT names Utility, Google AI Mode names ArcTouch, Gemini names Lickability, and Perplexity names Apple, and no two engines share a pick in their top five.
Citation-ready
The latest iOS Developers run found 36 recommended brands and 20 cited sources in AI answers.
ChopDawg ranks #1 for iOS Developers in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
ChopDawg, Lickability, and Appinventiv lead iOS Developers across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Clutch, Goodfirms, and Mismo are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | New | #1 | New | #1 | |
| #2 | #11 | #2 | 9 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #4 | |
| #5 | New | #5 | New | #5 | |
| #6 | New | #6 | New | #6 | |
| #7 | #18 | #7 | 11 | #7 | |
| #8 | #16 | #8 | 8 | #8 | |
| #9 | #7 | #9 | 2 | #7 | |
| #10 | #2 | #10 | 8 | #2 |
36 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | #3 | #8 | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +9 | - | #10 | #1 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #2 | #10 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +11 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | +8 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 9 | -2 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -8 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | New | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 12 | -6 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | +20 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 18 | +3 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | -1 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | -6 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 22 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 23 | +3 | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 24 | -12 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 25 | -3 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 26 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 27 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 28 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 29 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 30 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 31 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 32 | -8 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 33 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 34 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 35 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 36 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Utility | 1 |
| AppMakers USA | 2 |
| Chop Dawg | 3 |
| Instinctools | 4 |
| Goji Labs | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +3 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| ArcTouch | 1 |
| Appinventiv | 2 |
| Fueled | 3 |
| WillowTree | 4 |
| Mercury Development | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +3 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -2 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -4 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -2 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
7 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Lickability | 1 |
| ChopDawg.com | 2 |
| Exyte | 3 |
| Empat | 4 |
| Appetizer Mobile | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +2 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | -3 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +5 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Apple | 1 |
| Microsoft | 2 |
| Google Flutter (iOS support) | 3 |
| Facebook (Meta) - React Native | 4 |
| Firebase | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | +2 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
ChopDawg is the most recommended iOS developers brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Lickability and Appinventiv. The engines disagree completely. ChatGPT names Utility, Google AI Mode names ArcTouch, Gemini names Lickability, and Perplexity names Apple, and no two engines share a pick in their top five.
The most cited sources for iOS developers recommendations are Clutch, Goodfirms and Mismo, out of 20 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Clutch, Goodfirms and Mismo, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, ChopDawg, ArcTouch and Utility entered the top 10 and AppMakers USA, Lickability, Microsoft, Fueled and Empat moved three or more positions in the iOS developers index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: iOS Developers. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/professional-services-development-services-providers-mobile-app-development-companies-ios-developers
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.