Dataset size
The latest Brokerage Trading Platforms run found 21 recommended brands and 18 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Brokerage Trading Platforms category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
21
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
18
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
9%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | 1 |
| Interactive Brokers | 2 |
| Robinhood | 3 |
| Fidelity Investments | 4 |
| E*TRADE | 5 |
Movement
Charles Schwab has held the top position, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Nerdwallet, Forbes and Stockbrokers, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Gemini both name Charles Schwab first, Google AI Mode names Fidelity Investments, and Perplexity names Robinhood.
Citation-ready
The latest Brokerage Trading Platforms run found 21 recommended brands and 18 cited sources in AI answers.
Charles Schwab ranks #1 for Brokerage Trading Platforms in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Charles Schwab, Interactive Brokers, and Robinhood lead Brokerage Trading Platforms across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Nerdwallet, Forbes, and Stockbrokers are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #4 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #4 | |
| #6 | #7 | #6 | 1 | #6 | |
| #7 | #6 | #7 | 1 | #6 | |
| #8 | #10 | #8 | 2 | #6 | |
| #9 | #9 | #9 | 0 | #9 | |
| #10 | New | #10 | New | #10 |
21 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #2 | #1 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #3 | #3 | #3 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #5 | #4 | #4 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #2 | #1 | #5 | #6 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #4 | #5 | - | #5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #8 | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | -1 | #6 | #6 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | #7 | - | - | #8 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | +8 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | -1 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | -5 | #10 | #9 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 14 | +3 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | -2 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | -4 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() |
18 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 9 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 7 | ProrealtimeOfficial | 3 | ![]() |
| 8 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 11 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 13 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 17 | SchwabOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 18 | TradestationOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | 1 |
| Fidelity Investments | 2 |
| Interactive Brokers | 3 |
| E*TRADE | 4 |
| Robinhood | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Fidelity Investments | 1 |
| Charles Schwab | 2 |
| Interactive Brokers | 3 |
| Robinhood | 4 |
| E*TRADE | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | 1 |
| TradeStation | 2 |
| Interactive Brokers | 3 |
| Robinhood | 4 |
| Fidelity Investments | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -2 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +2 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 2 | ProrealtimeOfficial | 3 | ![]() |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | SchwabOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | TradestationOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Robinhood | 1 |
| Interactive Brokers | 2 |
| TD Ameritrade | 3 |
| Charles Schwab | 4 |
| E*TRADE | 5 |
9 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() |
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() |
Charles Schwab is the most recommended brokerage trading platforms brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Interactive Brokers and Robinhood. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Gemini both name Charles Schwab first, Google AI Mode names Fidelity Investments, and Perplexity names Robinhood.
The most cited sources for brokerage trading platforms recommendations are Nerdwallet, Forbes and Stockbrokers, out of 18 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Nerdwallet, Forbes and Stockbrokers, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, SogoTrade entered the top 10 and eToro moved three or more positions in the brokerage trading platforms index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Brokerage Trading Platforms. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/vertical-industry-financial-services-software-brokerage-trading-platforms
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.