Dataset size
The latest Brokerage Trading Platforms run found 15 recommended brands and 21 cited sources in AI answers.
Brokerage Trading Platforms
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Brokerage Trading Platforms category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 4 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
15
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
21
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
2%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | 1 |
| Fidelity | 2 |
| Interactive Brokers | 3 |
| E*TRADE | 4 |
| Robinhood | 5 |
What AI tools say about Brokerage Trading Platforms
Movement
What changed this week?
Charles Schwab held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: TradeStation and NinjaTrader dropped at least three positions.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Investopedia, Kiplinger and Stockbrokers, which means the citation field is open.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
Charles Schwab ranks #1 for Brokerage Trading Platforms in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Interactive Brokers lead Brokerage Trading Platforms across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Investopedia, Kiplinger, and Stockbrokers are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyBiggest gains
Moved up this week
J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing4 to #10
tastytrade3 to #9
Biggest losses
Moved down this week
TradeStation7 to #15
NinjaTrader4 to #13
Unchanged at the top
Leader held position
Charles Schwabstayed #1
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #3 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #2 | #3 | 1 | #1 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #3 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #4 | |
| #6 | #7 | #6 | 1 | #6 | |
| #7 | #6 | #7 | 1 | #4 | |
| #8 | #10 | #8 | 2 | #7 | |
| #9 | #12 | #9 | 3 | #7 | |
| #10 | #14 | #10 | 4 | #8 |
Current brand snapshot
15 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #2 | #1 | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | +1 | #1 | #2 | #3 | - | | |
| 3 | -1 | #3 | #3 | #2 | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #5 | #4 | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | #4 | #5 | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | #8 | #8 | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | #6 | #6 | - | - | | |
| 8 | +2 | #7 | #9 | - | - | | |
| 9 | +3 | #9 | #7 | - | - | | |
| 10 | +4 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 11 | 0 | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 12 | +1 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 13 | -4 | - | - | #10 | - | | |
| 14 | -3 | #10 | - | - | - | | |
| 15 | -7 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
21 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | | |
| 2 | 11 | | |
| 3 | 11 | | |
| 4 | 8 | | |
| 5 | 5 | | |
| 6 | 3 | | |
| 7 | 1 | | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | 1 | | |
| 11 | 1 | | |
| 12 | 1 | | |
| 13 | 1 | | |
| 14 | 1 | | |
| 15 | 1 | | |
| 16 | 1 | | |
| 17 | 1 | | |
| 18 | 1 | | |
| 19 | 1 | | |
| 20 | 1 | | |
| 21 | WebullOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Fidelity | 1 |
| Charles Schwab | 2 |
| Interactive Brokers | 3 |
| Robinhood | 4 |
| E*TRADE | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | 0 | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | -1 | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | -1 | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | -2 | #10 | - | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | | |
| 2 | 7 | | |
| 3 | 6 | | |
| 4 | 4 | | |
| 5 | 3 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | 1 |
| Fidelity | 2 |
| Interactive Brokers | 3 |
| E*TRADE | 4 |
| Robinhood | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | +1 | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | -2 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | +1 | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | +1 | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | +2 | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | +1 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | -6 | - | #10 | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
16 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | | |
| 2 | 1 | | |
| 3 | 1 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | | |
| 6 | 1 | | |
| 7 | 1 | | |
| 8 | 1 | | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | 1 | | |
| 11 | 1 | | |
| 12 | 1 | | |
| 13 | 1 | | |
| 14 | 1 | | |
| 15 | 1 | | |
| 16 | WebullOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | 1 |
| Interactive Brokers | 2 |
| Fidelity | 3 |
| E*TRADE | 4 |
| Robinhood | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | -1 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | 0 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | +3 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | +1 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 10 | -1 | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | | |
| 2 | 3 | | |
| 3 | 2 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about Brokerage Trading Platforms
Q1
Who leads Brokerage Trading Platforms in AI answers?
Charles Schwab is the most recommended brokerage trading platforms brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Fidelity and Interactive Brokers. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for Brokerage Trading Platforms?
The most cited sources for brokerage trading platforms recommendations are Investopedia, Kiplinger and Stockbrokers, out of 21 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Investopedia, Kiplinger and Stockbrokers, which means the citation field is open.
Q3
How fresh is this Brokerage Trading Platforms ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, TradeStation, J.P. Morgan Self-Directed Investing, NinjaTrader and tastytrade moved three or more positions in the brokerage trading platforms index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Brokerage Trading Platforms. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/vertical-industry-financial-services-software-brokerage-trading-platforms
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for Brokerage Trading Platforms, including 15 recommended brands and 21 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
[ get started ]
Make AI Search your next revenue channel
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.