Dataset size
The latest Financial Data APIs run found 18 recommended brands and 23 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Financial Data APIs category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track which brands are recommended, which sources are cited, and how rankings change week over week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 4 October 2026
Brands
Category coverage
18
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
23
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
43%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Massive | 1 |
| Alpha Vantage | 2 |
| Financial Modeling Prep | 3 |
| Twelve Data | 4 |
| Intrinio | 5 |
Movement
Massive has held the top position since 23 August 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Eulerpool, Financialmodelingprep and Eodhd are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 43% of all citations.
Citation-ready
The latest Financial Data APIs run found 18 recommended brands and 23 cited sources in AI answers.
Massive ranks #1 for Financial Data APIs in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Massive, Alpha Vantage, and Financial Modeling Prep lead Financial Data APIs across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Eulerpool, Qveris, and Apiscout are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #3 | |
| #5 | #8 | #5 | 3 | #4 | |
| #6 | #7 | #6 | 1 | #1 | |
| #7 | #5 | #7 | 2 | #3 | |
| #8 | #6 | #8 | 2 | #6 | |
| #9 | #10 | #9 | 1 | #1 | |
| #10 | #9 | #10 | 1 | #8 |
18 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #2 | #2 | #1 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #3 | #1 | #3 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #6 | #3 | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | #4 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | +3 | #7 | #6 | #7 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | #1 | - | #9 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | #5 | - | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | -2 | #8 | - | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | +6 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | -4 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | -3 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | 0 | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | 0 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | -6 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | -4 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
23 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EulerpoolOfficial | 7 | ![]() |
| 2 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | FinancialmodelingprepOfficial | 3 | ![]() ![]() |
| 6 | EodhdOfficial | 3 | ![]() |
| 7 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 8 | BloombergOfficial | 2 | ![]() |
| 9 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 11 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 12 | DatabentoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 13 | NasdaqOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 14 | IntrinioOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 17 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 18 | MassiveOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 19 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 20 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 21 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 22 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 23 | TwelvedataOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Bloomberg | 1 |
| Massive | 2 |
| Alpha Vantage | 3 |
| Twelve Data | 4 |
| Finnhub | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +9 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -3 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -2 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | +1 | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
13 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 2 | EodhdOfficial | 3 | ![]() |
| 3 | BloombergOfficial | 2 | ![]() |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | DatabentoOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 6 | NasdaqOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | IntrinioOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | MassiveOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 11 | FinancialmodelingprepOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 13 | TwelvedataOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Alpha Vantage | 1 |
| Massive | 2 |
| Financial Modeling Prep | 3 |
| Plaid | 4 |
| Tiingo | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +3 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -3 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Massive | 1 |
| Financial Modeling Prep | 2 |
| Alpha Vantage | 3 |
| Twelve Data | 4 |
| Finnhub | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -2 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -2 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EulerpoolOfficial | 7 | ![]() |
| 2 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | FinancialmodelingprepOfficial | 2 | ![]() |
Massive is the most recommended financial data APIs brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Alpha Vantage and Financial Modeling Prep. Per-engine leader data is not available for this run.
The most cited sources for financial data APIs recommendations are Eulerpool, Qveris and Apiscout, out of 23 tracked sources. Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Eulerpool, Financialmodelingprep and Eodhd are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 43% of all citations. The main independent sources are Qveris, Apiscout and Firecrawl.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Eulerpool and Intrinio moved three or more positions in the financial data APIs index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Financial Data APIs. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/vertical-industry-financial-services-software-financial-data-apis
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
[ get started ]
Track and optimize visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI Search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.