Dataset size
The latest Financial Risk Management Software run found 23 recommended brands and 24 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Financial Risk Management Software category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
23
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
24
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
27%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| SAS Institute | 1 |
| Moody's Analytics | 2 |
| IBM | 3 |
| Oracle | 4 |
| FIS | 5 |
Movement
SAS Institute overtook Moody's Analytics this week to take the top position.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are G2, LinkedIn and Riskonnect, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Perplexity name Moody's Analytics first and Gemini names Riskonnect, which does not appear in the top five of any other engine.
Citation-ready
The latest Financial Risk Management Software run found 23 recommended brands and 24 cited sources in AI answers.
SAS Institute ranks #1 for Financial Risk Management Software in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
SAS Institute, Moody's Analytics, and IBM lead Financial Risk Management Software across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
G2, LinkedIn, and Riskonnect are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | New | #1 | New | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #4 | #3 | 1 | #3 | |
| #4 | New | #4 | New | #4 | |
| #5 | #12 | #5 | 7 | #4 | |
| #6 | New | #6 | New | #6 | |
| #7 | #5 | #7 | 2 | #5 | |
| #8 | #3 | #8 | 5 | #3 | |
| #9 | #26 | #9 | 17 | #9 | |
| #10 | #15 | #10 | 5 | #10 |
23 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | #2 | #2 | #3 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #1 | #1 | - | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | #3 | #3 | #5 | #7 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | New | #5 | #4 | #2 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | +7 | #4 | #5 | - | #3 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | #10 | #6 | #8 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | -2 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -5 | #8 | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | +17 | - | #9 | - | #5 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | +5 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 11 | -5 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | New | #4 | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | #9 | #8 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 15 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | -6 | #10 | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | +12 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 19 | 0 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 21 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 22 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() | |
| 23 | New | #10 | #7 | - | - | ![]() |
24 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 3 | RiskonnectOfficial | 7 | ![]() |
| 4 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 9 | AxiomslOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 11 | FusionfabricOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 12 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 13 | IbmOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 14 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 15 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 16 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 17 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 18 | MoodysanalyticsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 19 | NumerixOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 20 | SapOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 21 | SasOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 22 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 23 | TdOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 24 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Moody's Analytics | 1 |
| SAS Risk Management | 2 |
| IBM OpenPages | 3 |
| FIS | 4 |
| Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
1 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Moody's Analytics | 1 |
| SAS Institute | 2 |
| IBM | 3 |
| Oracle | 4 |
| FIS Global | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -2 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -3 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Riskonnect | 1 |
| Oracle | 2 |
| SAS Institute | 3 |
| MetricStream | 4 |
| IBM | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +3 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RiskonnectOfficial | 7 | ![]() |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Moody's Analytics | 1 |
| SAS Institute | 2 |
| FIS | 3 |
| AxiomSL | 4 |
| Numerix | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AxiomslOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 2 | FiservOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 3 | FusionfabricOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 4 | IbmOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 6 | MoodysanalyticsOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 7 | NumerixOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 8 | SapOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 9 | SasOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
| 10 | TdOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
SAS Institute is the most recommended financial risk management software brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Moody's Analytics and IBM. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Perplexity name Moody's Analytics first and Gemini names Riskonnect.
The most cited sources for financial risk management software recommendations are G2, LinkedIn and Riskonnect, out of 24 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are G2, LinkedIn and Riskonnect, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, SAS Institute, Oracle and SAP entered the top 10 and Numerix, FIS, Murex, AxiomSL and MetricStream moved three or more positions in the financial risk management software index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Financial Risk Management Software. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/vertical-industry-financial-services-software-financial-risk-management-software
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.