Dataset size
The latest LIMS Software run found 25 recommended brands and 37 cited sources in AI answers.
LIMS Software
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the LIMS Software category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
25
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
37
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
46%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| LabWare | 1 |
| LabVantage | 2 |
| STARLIMS | 3 |
| CloudLIMS | 4 |
| Benchling | 5 |
What AI tools say about LIMS Software
Movement
What changed this week?
LabWare has held the top position since 28 June 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
Which sources shape AI answers?
Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Cloudlims, Qbench and Thermofisher are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 46% of all citations.
Engines
Do AI engines agree on the leader?
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Perplexity both name LabWare LIMS first and Google AI Mode and Gemini both name LabWare first.
Citation-ready
Key facts from this AI Brand Index report
Current leader
LabWare ranks #1 for LIMS Software in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Top brands
LabWare, LabVantage, and STARLIMS lead LIMS Software across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Brand sites
Cloudlims, G2, and Capterra are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Weekly movement
Top 10 onlyEntered the index
New in the top 10
Thermo Fisher Scientific#7
Biggest losses
Moved down this week
Unchanged at the top
Leader held position
LabWarestayed #1
Rank history
Weekly rank changes for the current top 10
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #3 | #2 | 1 | #2 | |
| #3 | #2 | #3 | 1 | #2 | |
| #4 | #5 | #4 | 1 | #4 | |
| #5 | #7 | #5 | 2 | #4 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #6 | |
| #7 | New | #7 | New | #7 | |
| #8 | #9 | #8 | 1 | #7 | |
| #9 | New | #9 | New | #9 | |
| #10 | #4 | #10 | 6 | #4 |
Current brand snapshot
25 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand |  ChatGPT |  Google AI Mode |  Gemini |  Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | #1 | | |
| 2 | +1 | #2 | #3 | #2 | #4 | | |
| 3 | -1 | #3 | #4 | #3 | #2 | | |
| 4 | +1 | - | #6 | #5 | #5 | | |
| 5 | +2 | #5 | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | 0 | #10 | #7 | #7 | - | | |
| 7 | New | #4 | #2 | #4 | #3 | | |
| 8 | +1 | #7 | #8 | #6 | - | | |
| 9 | New | #4 | #2 | #4 | #3 | | |
| 10 | -6 | #4 | #2 | #4 | #3 | | |
| 11 | -3 | #4 | #2 | #4 | #3 | | |
| 12 | New | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 13 | +5 | - | - | - | #6 | | |
| 14 | -3 | - | - | - | #7 | | |
| 15 | New | #7 | #8 | #6 | - | | |
| 16 | New | #8 | - | #8 | - | | |
| 17 | New | #8 | - | #8 | - | | |
| 18 | New | - | - | - | #8 | | |
| 19 | New | - | - | - | #9 | | |
| 20 | New | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 21 | -8 | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 22 | -1 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 23 | New | - | - | - | #10 | | |
| 24 | New | - | #10 | - | - | | |
| 25 | -9 | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
37 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CloudlimsOfficial | 12 | |
| 2 | 11 | | |
| 3 | 5 | | |
| 4 | QbenchOfficial | 4 | |
| 5 | ThermofisherOfficial | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | | |
| 7 | 3 | | |
| 8 | 3 | | |
| 9 | AutoscribeinformaticsOfficial | 2 | |
| 10 | LabvantageOfficial | 2 | |
| 11 | LabwareOfficial | 2 | |
| 12 | SapiosciencesOfficial | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | | |
| 14 | 2 | | |
| 15 | 1 | | |
| 16 | 3dsOfficial | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | | |
| 18 | 1 | | |
| 19 | AutoscribeOfficial | 1 | |
| 20 | BenchlingOfficial | 1 | |
| 21 | 1 | | |
| 22 | BrclabsOfficial | 1 | |
| 23 | 1 | | |
| 24 | 1 | | |
| 25 | 1 | | |
| 26 | 1 | | |
| 27 | 1 | | |
| 28 | IdbsOfficial | 1 | |
| 29 | 1 | | |
| 30 | LabforwardOfficial | 1 | |
| 31 | LabguruOfficial | 1 | |
| 32 | 1 | | |
| 33 | 1 | | |
| 34 | 1 | | |
| 35 | 1 | | |
| 36 | ScispotOfficial | 1 | |
| 37 | StarlimsOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| LabWare LIMS | 1 |
| LabVantage LIMS | 2 |
| STARLIMS | 3 |
| Thermo Scientific SampleManager LIMS | 4 |
| Benchling | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | | |
| 2 | New | #2 | - | - | - | | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | | |
| 4 | -2 | #4 | - | - | - | | |
| 5 | +4 | #5 | - | - | - | | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | |
Current source snapshot
9 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | | |
| 2 | 4 | | |
| 3 | 3dsOfficial | 1 | |
| 4 | AutoscribeinformaticsOfficial | 1 | |
| 5 | BenchlingOfficial | 1 | |
| 6 | IdbsOfficial | 1 | |
| 7 | QbenchOfficial | 1 | |
| 8 | SapiosciencesOfficial | 1 | |
| 9 | ThermofisherOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| LabWare | 1 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific | 2 |
| LabVantage Solutions | 3 |
| STARLIMS | 4 |
| Benchling | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | | |
| 2 | New | - | #2 | - | - | | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #3 | - | - | | |
| 4 | -1 | - | #4 | - | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | - | #5 | - | - | | |
| 6 | +1 | - | #6 | - | - | | |
| 7 | +1 | - | #7 | - | - | | |
| 8 | -2 | - | #8 | - | - | | |
| 9 | +1 | - | #9 | - | - | | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| LabWare | 1 |
| LabVantage | 2 |
| STARLIMS | 3 |
| Thermo Scientific SampleManager | 4 |
| CloudLIMS | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | | |
| 3 | +1 | - | - | #3 | - | | |
| 4 | -1 | - | - | #4 | - | | |
| 5 | 0 | - | - | #5 | - | | |
| 6 | +2 | - | - | #6 | - | | |
| 7 | -1 | - | - | #7 | - | | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | | |
| 10 | -3 | - | - | #10 | - | |
Current source snapshot
13 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CloudlimsOfficial | 7 | |
| 2 | QbenchOfficial | 2 | |
| 3 | AutoscribeinformaticsOfficial | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | 1 | | |
| 6 | LabguruOfficial | 1 | |
| 7 | LabvantageOfficial | 1 | |
| 8 | LabwareOfficial | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | SapiosciencesOfficial | 1 | |
| 11 | ScispotOfficial | 1 | |
| 12 | StarlimsOfficial | 1 | |
| 13 | ThermofisherOfficial | 1 | |
Position history
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| LabWare LIMS | 1 |
| STARLIMS | 2 |
| Thermo Fischer SampleManager | 3 |
| LabVantage LIMS | 4 |
| CloudLIMS | 5 |
Current brand snapshot
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | - | #2 | | |
| 3 | New | - | - | - | #3 | | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | - | #4 | | |
| 5 | New | - | - | - | #5 | | |
| 6 | +3 | - | - | - | #6 | | |
| 7 | -2 | - | - | - | #7 | | |
| 8 | New | - | - | - | #8 | | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | |
Current source snapshot
16 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | | |
| 2 | 2 | | |
| 3 | 1 | | |
| 4 | 1 | | |
| 5 | AutoscribeOfficial | 1 | |
| 6 | BrclabsOfficial | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | | |
| 8 | CloudlimsOfficial | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | | |
| 10 | 1 | | |
| 11 | 1 | | |
| 12 | LabforwardOfficial | 1 | |
| 13 | LabvantageOfficial | 1 | |
| 14 | LabwareOfficial | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | | |
| 16 | ThermofisherOfficial | 1 | |
Common AI search questions about LIMS Software
Q1
Who leads LIMS Software in AI answers?
LabWare is the most recommended LIMS software brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are LabVantage and STARLIMS. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT and Perplexity both name LabWare LIMS first and Google AI Mode and Gemini both name LabWare first.
Q2
Which cited sources are used for LIMS Software?
The most cited sources for LIMS software recommendations are Cloudlims, G2 and Capterra, out of 37 tracked sources. Answers in this category lean on vendor pages: Cloudlims, Qbench and Thermofisher are the most cited brand-owned sources, and official domains account for 46% of all citations. The main independent sources are G2, Capterra and Gartner.
Q3
How fresh is this LIMS Software ranking?
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Thermo Fischer SampleManager entered the top 10 and Thermo Scientific SampleManager and Thermo Scientific SampleManager LIMS moved three or more positions in the LIMS software index.
How to cite this report
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: LIMS Software. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/vertical-industry-laboratory-software-lims-software
Report data
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
AI Brand Index methodology
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.
- SupaIntent measures buying-intent AI answers across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
- This report uses the latest observed AI answers for LIMS Software, including 25 recommended brands and 37 cited sources.
- Brand sites are identified from official domains and subdomains, then separated from review, community and publisher sources.
- Weekly movement compares the latest rank with the previous collected position for each brand.
Reveal where AI sends your clients
Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.