Dataset size
The latest Legal Case Management Software run found 17 recommended brands and 10 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Legal Case Management Software category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
17
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
10
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
2%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Clio | 1 |
| MyCase | 2 |
| PracticePanther | 3 |
| Smokeball | 4 |
| Filevine | 5 |
Movement
Clio held the top position, but the ranking below it moved sharply: LEAP, CosmoLex and Litify dropped at least three positions.
Sources
Review platforms shape this category: Capterra, G2 and G2 are the most cited review sources, and review platforms account for 77% of all citations.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Clio Manage, which does not appear in the top five of any other engine and Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity name Clio first.
Citation-ready
The latest Legal Case Management Software run found 17 recommended brands and 10 cited sources in AI answers.
Clio ranks #1 for Legal Case Management Software in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther lead Legal Case Management Software across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Capterra, G2, and G2 are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Moved up this week
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #2 | #2 | 0 | #2 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #3 | |
| #4 | #5 | #4 | 1 | #3 | |
| #5 | #4 | #5 | 1 | #4 | |
| #6 | #16 | #6 | 10 | #6 | |
| #7 | #19 | #7 | 12 | #7 | |
| #8 | #20 | #8 | 12 | #6 | |
| #9 | #14 | #9 | 5 | #9 | |
| #10 | #6 | #10 | 4 | #6 |
17 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | #1 | #1 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | #2 | #2 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #5 | #5 | #4 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | #4 | #4 | #3 | #6 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | #3 | #3 | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | +10 | #7 | #7 | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | +12 | #6 | #10 | #7 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | +12 | #9 | - | - | #4 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +5 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 10 | -4 | - | #8 | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 11 | +2 | #8 | - | #9 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 12 | -4 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 14 | -5 | #10 | #9 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 15 | -4 | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
10 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | 18 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 10 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 9 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 10 | MycaseOfficial | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Clio Manage | 1 |
| 8am MyCase | 2 |
| Filevine | 3 |
| Smokeball | 4 |
| PracticePanther | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +1 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +4 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -3 | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Clio | 1 |
| MyCase | 2 |
| Filevine | 3 |
| Smokeball | 4 |
| PracticePanther | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +2 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +3 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -2 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
3 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Clio | 1 |
| MyCase | 2 |
| Smokeball | 3 |
| PracticePanther | 4 |
| Filevine | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +2 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -2 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | +4 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -2 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Clio | 1 |
| MyCase | 2 |
| PracticePanther | 3 |
| Rocket Matter | 4 |
| Zola Suite | 5 |
9 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | +6 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | -3 | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 1 | ![]() |
Clio is the most recommended legal case management software brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are MyCase and PracticePanther. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Clio Manage and Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity name Clio first.
The most cited sources for legal case management software recommendations are Capterra, G2 and G2, out of 10 tracked sources. Review platforms shape this category: Capterra, G2 and G2 are the most cited review sources, and review platforms account for 77% of all citations.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Assembly Neos, Rocket Matter, CASEpeer, Zola Suite and LEAP and 2 other brands moved three or more positions in the legal case management software index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Legal Case Management Software. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/vertical-industry-legal-software-legal-case-management-software
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.