Dataset size
The latest Note-Taking Software run found 16 recommended brands and 30 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Note-Taking Software category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
16
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
30
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
2%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Notion | 1 |
| Microsoft OneNote | 2 |
| Evernote | 3 |
| Obsidian | 4 |
| Apple Notes | 5 |
Movement
Notion overtook Microsoft OneNote this week to take the top position.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Zapier, Theverge and Storyflow, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Microsoft OneNote, Google AI Mode and Gemini both name Notion first, and Perplexity names Evernote.
Citation-ready
The latest Note-Taking Software run found 16 recommended brands and 30 cited sources in AI answers.
Notion ranks #1 for Note-Taking Software in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Notion, Microsoft OneNote, and Evernote lead Note-Taking Software across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Zapier, Theverge, and Storyflow are the most cited brand sites in this category.
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #1 | 1 | #1 | |
| #2 | #1 | #2 | 1 | #1 | |
| #3 | #3 | #3 | 0 | #2 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #4 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #5 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #5 | |
| #7 | #8 | #7 | 1 | #5 | |
| #8 | #7 | #8 | 1 | #7 | |
| #9 | #11 | #9 | 2 | #8 | |
| #10 | #9 | #10 | 1 | #9 |
16 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | #2 | #1 | #1 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | #1 | #2 | #2 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | #5 | #4 | #4 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | #3 | #3 | #3 | #5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | #4 | #5 | #5 | #7 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | #6 | #6 | #6 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | #8 | #9 | #7 | #6 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | #7 | #8 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 9 | +2 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | #10 | #7 | - | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 11 | -1 | #9 | - | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 12 | 0 | - | #10 | - | #8 | ![]() ![]() | |
| 13 | +1 | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 15 | -2 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() | |
| 16 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Microsoft OneNote | 1 |
| Notion | 2 |
| Obsidian | 3 |
| Apple Notes | 4 |
| Evernote | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +2 | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -2 | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Notion | 1 |
| Microsoft OneNote | 2 |
| Obsidian | 3 |
| Evernote | 4 |
| Apple Notes | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | #5 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | +1 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | 0 | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
8 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 6 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 8 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Notion | 1 |
| Microsoft OneNote | 2 |
| Obsidian | 3 |
| Evernote | 4 |
| Apple Notes | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | -1 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -2 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | -1 | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -1 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Evernote | 1 |
| Notion | 2 |
| Microsoft OneNote | 3 |
| Roam Research | 4 |
| Obsidian | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | +2 | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | +2 | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
Notion is the most recommended Note-Taking software brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Microsoft OneNote and Evernote. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Microsoft OneNote, Google AI Mode and Gemini both name Notion first, and Perplexity names Evernote.
The most cited sources for Note-Taking software recommendations are Zapier, Theverge and Storyflow, out of 30 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Zapier, Theverge and Storyflow, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, the top 10 of the Note-Taking software index stayed mostly steady.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Note-Taking Software. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/collaboration-and-productivity-note-taking-software
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.