Dataset size
The latest Toilet Paper run found 23 recommended brands and 14 cited sources in AI answers.
This weekly AI Brand Index shows how AI tools answer buyer questions in the Toilet Paper category. SupaIntent asks each LLM the same question: which brands are the most visible, significant, and recommended in that niche. Each system returns its own top. We track what brands are recommended, which cited sources are used and how positions move week to week. Use it to see the freshest AI visibility data for this category.
Updated 9 August 2026
Brands
Category coverage
23
ranked across AI engines
Sources
Evidence base
14
domains cited in answers
Brand sites
Official share
4%
from brand-owned domains
AI model filter
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charmin | 1 |
| Quilted Northern | 2 |
| Cottonelle | 3 |
| Angel Soft | 4 |
| Scott | 5 |
Movement
Charmin has held the top position since 28 June 2026, and the ranking below it moved little this week.
Sources
No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Consumerreports, Fortunebusinessinsights and Yourbestdigs, which means the citation field is open.
Engines
The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Procter & Gamble Co., which does not appear in the top five of any other engine and Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity name Charmin first.
Citation-ready
The latest Toilet Paper run found 23 recommended brands and 14 cited sources in AI answers.
Charmin ranks #1 for Toilet Paper in the latest SupaIntent AI Brand Index run.
Charmin, Quilted Northern, and Cottonelle lead Toilet Paper across AI answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity.
Consumerreports, Fortunebusinessinsights, and Yourbestdigs are the most cited brand sites in this category.
New in the top 10
Moved down this week
Leader held position
Rank history
| Rank | Brand | Previous | Current | Change | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #1 | #1 | 0 | #1 | |
| #2 | #3 | #2 | 1 | #2 | |
| #3 | #2 | #3 | 1 | #2 | |
| #4 | #4 | #4 | 0 | #4 | |
| #5 | #5 | #5 | 0 | #3 | |
| #6 | #6 | #6 | 0 | #6 | |
| #7 | #7 | #7 | 0 | #7 | |
| #8 | New | #8 | New | #8 | |
| #9 | #8 | #9 | 1 | #6 | |
| #10 | New | #10 | New | #10 |
23 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | #1 | #1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 2 | +1 | #2 | #2 | #3 | #8 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 3 | -1 | - | #2 | #2 | #2 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | #3 | #6 | #3 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 5 | 0 | - | #5 | #4 | #4 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | #6 | #7 | #5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | #7 | #5 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | -1 | - | #8 | #10 | #7 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 11 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 12 | New | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 13 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 14 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 15 | -3 | - | #10 | #8 | - | ![]() ![]() | |
| 16 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 17 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 18 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 19 | -8 | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 20 | -11 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 21 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 22 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() | |
| 23 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Procter & Gamble Co. | 1 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 2 |
| Essity AB | 3 |
| Georgia-Pacific LLC | 4 |
| Hengan Group | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New | #1 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | New | #2 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | New | #3 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | New | #4 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | New | #5 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | #6 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | #7 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | #8 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | #9 | - | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | #10 | - | - | - | ![]() |
4 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 1 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charmin | 1 |
| Cottonelle | 2 |
| Angel Soft | 3 |
| Quilted Northern | 4 |
| Scott | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | #1 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | #3 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | +1 | - | #4 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | -1 | - | #2 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | 0 | - | #6 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | 0 | - | #7 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | 0 | - | #8 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | #9 | - | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | #10 | - | - | ![]() |
2 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 1 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charmin | 1 |
| Cottonelle | 2 |
| Quilted Northern | 3 |
| Scott | 4 |
| Who Gives A Crap | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | #1 | - | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | #2 | - | ![]() | |
| 3 | 0 | - | - | #3 | - | ![]() | |
| 4 | 0 | - | - | #4 | - | ![]() | |
| 5 | +3 | - | - | #5 | - | ![]() | |
| 6 | -1 | - | - | #6 | - | ![]() | |
| 7 | -1 | - | - | #7 | - | ![]() | |
| 8 | New | - | - | #8 | - | ![]() | |
| 9 | 0 | - | - | #9 | - | ![]() | |
| 10 | -3 | - | - | #10 | - | ![]() |
5 sources
| # | Source | Ment.Mentions | LLMs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 5 | ![]() | |
| 3 | 4 | ![]() | |
| 4 | 2 | ![]() | |
| 5 | 2 | ![]() |
Position history chart for the top brands in this AI Brand Index category. Lower rank numbers mean stronger visibility.
| Brand | Latest rank |
|---|---|
| Charmin | 1 |
| Cottonelle | 2 |
| Angel Soft | 3 |
| Scott | 4 |
| Kirkland Signature | 5 |
10 brands
| # | Pos. | Brand | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini | Perplexity | Seen in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | - | - | - | #1 | ![]() | |
| 2 | 0 | - | - | - | #2 | ![]() | |
| 3 | +1 | - | - | - | #3 | ![]() | |
| 4 | +4 | - | - | - | #4 | ![]() | |
| 5 | +2 | - | - | - | #5 | ![]() | |
| 6 | New | - | - | - | #6 | ![]() | |
| 7 | New | - | - | - | #7 | ![]() | |
| 8 | -5 | - | - | - | #8 | ![]() | |
| 9 | New | - | - | - | #9 | ![]() | |
| 10 | New | - | - | - | #10 | ![]() |
Charmin is the most recommended toilet paper brand in the latest AI Brand Index run. The next highest-ranked brands are Quilted Northern and Cottonelle. The engines disagree on the leader. ChatGPT names Procter & Gamble Co. and Google AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity name Charmin first.
The most cited sources for toilet paper recommendations are Consumerreports, Fortunebusinessinsights and Yourbestdigs, out of 14 tracked sources. No single publisher dominates. The most cited sources are Consumerreports, Fortunebusinessinsights and Yourbestdigs, which means the citation field is open.
The AI Brand Index updates every Sunday. In the latest run, Procter & Gamble Co. and Essity AB entered the top 10 and Presto! moved three or more positions in the toilet paper index.
Cite the canonical SupaIntent report page when referencing this AI visibility ranking.
SupaIntent AI Brand Index: Toilet Paper. https://supaintent.com/ai-brand-index/home-and-garden-household-supplies-household-paper-products-toilet-paper
Download the same ranking data used by the chart, tables and Dataset schema.
Rankings use collected AI answers, cited sources, brand-site matching, and provider-level position history.

Track prompt-level visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI search. See which competitors win the answer, which sources shape the response, and where your brand is missing.